Welcome to the NTI research library. This section contains a rich collection of information about our products and the associated research. Click on the subject line to read more. Subscribe to our e-newsletter to receive updates on products and research.
Lipid Replacement/Antioxidant Therapy as an Adjunct Supplement to Reduce the Adverse Effects of Cancer Therapy and Restore Mitochondrial Function
GARTH L. NICOLSON, Ph.D
The Institute of Molecular Medicine, Huntington Beach, CA USA
Keywords: lipids; antioxidants; dietary supplement;
mitochondria; fatigue; cancer therapy
*The authors have no financial interest in the products discussed in this
contribution.
ABSTRACT
The most common complaints of cancer patients undergoing chemo-
or radiotherapy are fatigue, nausea, vomiting, malaise, diarrhea and headaches.
These adverse effects are thought to be due to damage of normal tissues during
the course of therapy. In addition, recent evidence indicates that fatigue is
related to reduced mitochondrial function
through loss of efficiency in the electron transport chain caused by membrane
oxidation, and this occurs during aging, in fatiguing illnesses and in cancer
patients during cytotoxic therapy. Lipid Replacement Therapy administered as a
nutritional supplement with antioxidants can prevent oxidative membrane damage
to normal tissues, restore
mitochondrial and other cellular membrane functions and reduce the adverse
effects of cancer therapy. Recent clinical trials using patients with chronic
fatigue have shown the benefit of Lipid Replacement Therapy plus antioxidants in
restoring mitochondrial electron transport function and reducing moderate to
severe chronic fatigue by protecting
mitochondrial and other cellular membranes from oxidative and other damage. In
cancer patients a placebo-controlled, cross-over clinical trial using Lipid
Replacement Therapy plus antioxidants demonstrated that the adverse effects of
chemotherapy can be reduced in 57-70% of patients. Dietary use of unoxidized
membrane lipids plus antioxidants is recommended for patients undergoing cancer
therapy to improve quality of life but should not be taken at the same time of
day as the therapy.
INTRODUCTION
Cancer patients undergoing cytotoxic therapy frequently complain of adverse
effects due to their therapy. Fatigue is usually the most common complaint, but
other complaints include pain, nausea, vomiting, malaise, diarrhea, headaches,
rashes, infections and other problems.1-2 Over 75% of cancer patients reported
fatigue associated with
cancer therapy, whereas only 32% of treating physicians recognized this
problem.2 Both physicians and patients complained more often of fatigue
than pain, and most patients believed that fatigue associated with cancer
therapy was untreatable.2
Fatigue can vary in degree from mild to
severe during cancer therapy. In many studies fatigue was reported as the most
troublesome and disabling side effect during cancer therapy,3-6 and it is often
a significant reason why patients discontinue treatment.7 Although fatigue is
often the most commonly reported adverse symptom during cancer
therapy, there has been little progress in controlling and reducing fatigue in
cancer patients.8 Therefore, reducing fatigue associated with cancer therapy is
an important goal, and this brief review will concentrate on new nutritional
methods to reduce fatigue and improve the quality of life of cancer patients.
Fatigue and oxidative damage to mitochondrial membranes
Intractable or chronic fatigue lasting more than 6 months that is not reversed
by sleep is the most common complaint of patients seeking medical care.9,10 It
occurs naturally during aging and is also an important secondary condition in
many clinical diagnoses. 9-11 The phenomenon of fatigue has been defined as a
multidimensional sensation, and recently attempts have been made to determine
the extent of fatigue and its possible causes.11-13 Most patients understand
fatigue as a loss of energy and inability to perform even simple tasks without
exertion. Many medical conditions are associated with fatigue, including
respiratory, coronary, musculoskeletal, and bowel conditions as well as
infections and cancer.10-14
Fatigue is related to reductions in the efficiency of cellular energy systems found primarily in mitochondria. Damage to mitochondrial components, mainly by oxidation, can impair their ability to produce high-energy molecules such as ATP and NADH. This occurs naturally with aging and during chronic illnesses, where the production of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) can cause oxidative stress and cellular damage, resulting in oxidation of lipids, proteins and DNA.16-17 When oxidized, these molecules are structurally and sometimes functionally changed. Important targets of ROS damage are the phospholipid-containing membranes of mitochondria as well as mitochondrial DNA.15-17
Damage of cellular structures by ROS occurs
during aging, and this is caused by excess ROS production resulting in
accumulation of mitochondrial and nuclear damage.15-18 Normally free-radical
scavenging enzymes are present in cells to neutralize excess ROS and repair the
enzymes that repair ROS-mediated damage.17,18 Some ROS production is important
in triggering cell proliferation, gene expression and destruction of invading
microbes,19,20 but
with aging ROS damage accumulates and eventually impairs cellular function.15-18
Thus antioxidant enzymes and enzyme repair mechanisms along with biosynthesis
cannot restore or replace enough of the ROS-damaged molecules to maintain
function.15,16,20-22 Disease and infection can result in oxidative damage that
exceeds the abilities of cellular systems to repair and replace damaged
molecules.15,16,19 and this is also the situation in fatiguing illnesses [5,6].
In the case of fatigue, there is evidence
that oxidative damage impairs mitochondrial function. For example, in chronic
fatigue syndrome patients there is evidence of oxidative damage to DNA and
lipids23,24 as well as the presence of oxidized blood markers, such as
methemoglobin, that are indicative of excess oxidative stress.25 In addition,
oxidative damage to DNA and membrane lipids has been found in muscle biopsy
samples obtained from chronic fatigue syndrome patients.26 These authors also
found increases in antioxidant enzymes, such as glutathione peroxidase,
suggesting that this was an attempt to compensate for excess oxidative stress.26
Chronic fatigue syndrome patients have sustained elevated levels of
peroxynitrite due to excess nitric oxide, and this has been proposed to result
in lipid peroxidation and loss of mitochondrial function as well as changes in
cytokine levels that exert a positive feedback on nitric oxide production.27 In
addition to mitochondrial membranes, mitochondrial enzymes are also inactivated
by peroxynitrite, and this could contribute to loss of mitochrondrial
function.28,29 Finally, although there are cellular molecules that counteract
the excess oxidative capacity of ROS, such as glutathione and cysteine, these
have been found at lower levels in chronic fatigue syndrome patients.30
Replacement of damaged membrane components by Lipid Replacement Therapy
Critical targets of ROS damage are the genetic apparatus and cellular
membranes.14,15,,31 In the case of membranes oxidation modifies lipid structure
and can affect lipid fluidity, permeability and membrane function.32,33 Similar
changes occur in fatiguing illnesses, such as chronic fatigue syndrome, where
patients show increased susceptibility to oxidative stress and
peroxidation.23,24 One of the most important changes caused by accumulated ROS
damage during aging and in fatigue is loss of electron transport function, and
this appears to be directly related to mitochondrial membrane lipid
peroxidation,15 which induces permeability changes in mitochondria and loss of
transmembrane potential.15,31
Lipid Replacement Therapy (LRT) plus
antioxidants have been used to reverse ROS damage and increase mitochondrial
function in certain clinical disorders and conditions, such as chronic
fatigue.14,34,35 LRT results in replacement of damaged cellular lipids with
undamaged lipids to ensure proper structure and function of cellular structures,
mainly cellular and organelle membranes.14 Damage to membrane lipids can impair
fluidity, electrical
properties, enzymatic activities and transport functions of cellular and
organelle membranes.31-33 During LRT lipids must be protected from oxidative and
other damage, and this is also necessary during storage as well as during
ingestion, digestion, and absorption in vivo. To be effective LRT must result in
delivery of high concentrations of
unoxidized, undamaged membrane lipids in order to reverse the damage and restore
function to oxidized cellular membranes. Combined with antioxidant supplements,
LRT has proven to be an effective method to prevent ROS-associated changes in
certain clinical conditions.14
LRT is possible because cellular lipids are in dynamic equilibrium in the
body.14 Orally ingested lipids diffuse to the gut epithelium and are bound and
eventually transported into the blood and lymph using specific carrier
lipoproteins and also by nonspecific partitioning and diffusion mechanisms.36,37
Within minutes, lipid molecules are transported from gut epithelial cells to
endothelial cells, then excreted into and transported in the circulation bound
to lipoproteins and blood cells where they are generally protected from
oxidation.37,38 Once in the blood, specific lipoprotein carriers and red blood
cells protect lipids throughout their passage and eventual deposition onto
specific cell membrane receptors where they can be taken into cells via
endosomes and by diffusion.39 After binding to specific cell surface receptors
that bring the lipids into cells, lipid transporters in the cytoplasm deliver
specific lipids to cell organelles where they are taken in by specific transport
proteins, partitioning, and diffusion.40 The concentration gradients that exist
from the gut during the digestion of lipids to their absorption by gut
epithelial cells and their transfer to blood and then tissues are important in
driving the unoxidized lipids into cells. Damaged or oxidized lipids can be
removed by a reverse process that is mediated by lipid transfer proteins and
enzymes that recognize and degrade damaged lipids.40
Prevention of oxidative damage by Lipid
Replacement/Antioxidant Therapy
The repair of damaged cellular and mitochondrial membranes as well as DNA are
important in preventing loss of electron transport function and cellular
energy.21,22 This can be accomplished, in part, by neutralizing ROS with various
antioxidants or increasing free-radical scavenging systems. Thus dietary
supplementation with antioxidants and some accessory molecules, such as zinc and
certain vitamins, are important in maintaining antioxidant and free-radical
scavenging systems.23 In addition to zinc and vitamins, there are at least 40
micronutrients required in the human diet,42 and aging increases the need to
supplement these to prevent age-associated damage to mitochondria and other
cellular elements. Antioxidant use alone, however, may not be sufficient to
maintain cellular components free of
ROS damage. Thus LRT is important in replacing ROS-damaged membrane lipids and
returning membrane function to normal.14
Dietary antioxidant supplementation has partially reversed the age-related declines in cellular antioxidants and mitochondrial enzyme activities and prevented mitochondria from most age-associated functional decline. For example, in rodents fed diets supplemented with antioxidants the antioxidants were found to inhibit the progression of certain age-associated changes in cerebral mitochondrial electron transport chain enzyme activities.43,44 Thus animal studies have shown that antioxidants can partially prevent age-associated changes in mitochondrial function. However, antioxidants alone cannot completely eliminate ROS damage to mitochondrial membranes, and this is why LRT is an important addition to antioxidant dietary supplementation.14 Dietary antioxidants may also modify the pathogenic processes of certain diseases.14,23,27,45 For example, antioxidant administration has been shown to have certain neuroprotective effects, such as prevention of age-related hearing loss.46 The dietary use of antioxidants has been shown to be useful in preventing age-associated mitochondrial dysfunction and damage, inhibiting the age-associated decline in immune and other functions and prolonging the lifespan of laboratory animals.14,48.49
Preclinical and clinical studies using
Lipid Replacement/Antioxidant Therapy
Antioxidants and LRT results in replacement of damaged cellular and
mitochondrial membrane phospholipids and other lipids that are essential
structural and functional components of all biological membranes.14 One such LRT
dietary supplement is NTFactor®, and this supplement has been used successfully
in animal and clinical lipid replacement studies.34,35 NTFactor's encapsulated
lipids are protected from oxidation in the gut and can be absorbed and
transported into tissues without undue damage. NTFactor contains a variety of
components, including phospholipids, glycophospholipids and other lipids,
nutrients, probiotics, vitamins, minerals and plant extracts (Table 1).
NTFactor® has also been used to reduce
age-related damage in laboratory animals. In aged rodents, Seidman et al.46
found that NTFactor® prevented hearing loss associated with aging and shifted
the threshold hearing from 35-40 dB in control aged animals to 13-17 dB. They
also found that NTFactor® preserved cochlear mitochondrial function.
NTFactor® also prevented aging-related mitochondrial DNA deletions found in the
cochlear.46 Thus LRT was
successful in preventing age-associated hearing loss and reducing mitochondrial
damage in rodents.
In clinical studies LRT has been used to
reduce fatigue and protect cellular and mitochondrial membranes from
damage by ROS.34,35 Propax® containing NTFactor® has been used in a dietary LRT
study with severe chronic fatigued patients to reduce their fatigue.34 Using the
Piper Fatigue Scale12 for measurement of fatigue we found that fatigue was
reduced approximately 40.5% (P<0.0001), from severe to moderate fatigue, after
eight weeks of
supplementation with Propax® containing NTFactor® (Table 2). In more recent
studies we examine the effects of NTFactor® on fatigue in moderately and mildly
fatigued subjects and to determine if their mitochondrial function, as measured
by the transport and reduction of Rhodamine-123 and fatigue scores, improved
with administration of NTFactor®.35 Oral administration of NTFactor® for 12
weeks resulted in a 35.5% reduction in fatigue, respectively (P<0.001) (Table
2).35 In this clinical trial there was good correspondence between reductions in
fatigue and gains in mitochondrial function. Within 8 weeks of LRT with NTFactor®,
mitochondrial function was significantly improved (P<0.001), and within 12 weeks
of NTFactor® supplementation, mitochondrial function was found to be similar to
that
of young healthy adults.35 In contrast, after a 12-week wash-out period fatigue
and mitochondrial function were intermediate between the initial starting values
and those found after eight or 12 weeks on supplement.35 The results indicate
that in moderately to severely fatigued subjects dietary LRT can significantly
improve and even restore mitochondrial function and significantly improve
fatigue. Similar findings have been observed in chronic fatigue syndrome and
fibromyalgia syndrome patients on LRT plus antioxidants for 8 weeks (Table 2).
In this case LRT with Propax® containing NTFactor® reduced moderate to severe
fatigue by 43.1%.50
Lipid Replacement/Antioxidant Therapy for patients undergoing cancer therapy
LRT plus antioxidants has proven useful for patients undergoing cancer
chemotherapy. For example, Propax® with NTFactor® has been used in cancer
patients to reduce the adverse , effects of cancer therapy, such as
chemotherapy-induced fatigue, nausea, vomiting, malaise, diarrhea, headaches and
other side effects.51 Two studies were conducted by Colodny et al.51 on advanced
colon, pancreatic or rectal cancers receiving identical 5-
FU/methotrexate/Leukovorin therapy on a 12-week schedule. In the unblinded part
of the study the effectiveness of Propax® with NTFactor® administered before and
during chemotherapy was determined by examining the signs/symptoms and side
effects of therapy. This quality of life evaluation was conducted by a research
nurse, and it was determined that patients on Propax® supplementation
experienced fewer episodes of fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, constipation, skin
changes, insomnia and other effects. In contrast, no changes or a worsening were
noted in the occurrence of sore throat or other indications of infection. In the
open label part of the trial 81% of patients demonstrated an overall improvement
in quality of life parameters while on chemotherapy.
In the double-blinded, cross-over,
placebo-controlled, randomized part of the Colodny et al.51 study on advanced
cancers the patients on Propax® LRT showed improvements in signs/symptoms
associated with chemotherapy but only in the arm of the trial where the
supplement was administered.51 LRT with Propax® resulted in improvement from
fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, impaired taste, constipation, insomnia and other
quality of life indicators.
Following cross-over from the placebo arm to the Propax® supplement arm, 57-70%
of patients reported rapid improvements in nausea, impaired taste, tiredness,
appetite, sick feeling and other quality of life indicators (Table 3).51
Although preliminary, this clinical trial demonstrated that usefulness of LRT
and antioxidants given during a 12-week schedule of chemotherapy.
Since the success of cytotoxic cancer
therapy depends to some degree on free radical oxidation damage to cancer cells,
LRT plus antioxidants should not be administered at the same time of day as
chemo- or radiotherapy. The primary use of LRT plus antioxidants is to prevent
damage to normal cellular structures, and this can be accomplished by
administering the supplement at different times than the therapy to salvage
normal cellular structures and diminish the adverse side effects of therapy.
References
1. Buckingham R, Fitt J, Sitzia J: Patients’ experience of chemotherapy:
side-effects of carboplatin in the treatment of carcinoma of the ovary. Eur J
Cancer Care 6(1):59-71, 1997.
2. Vogelzang N, Breitbart W, Cella D, et al: Patient caregiver and oncologist
perceptions of cancer-related fatigue: results of a tripart assessment survey.
Semin Hematol 34(Suppl 2):4-12, 1997.
3. Romanelli A, Bozzone A, Magrone G, et al: Cancer-related fatigue: evaluation
and treatment. Rays 29(4):453-455, 2004.
4. Bender CM, Ergyn FS, Rosenzweig MQ, et al: Symptom Clusters in Breast Cancer
Across 3 Phases of the Disease. Cancer Nurs 28(3):219-225, 2005.
5. Ahlberg K, Ekman T, Gaston-Johansson F: Fatigue, psychological distress,
coping resources, and functional status during radiotherapy for uterine cancer.
Oncol Nurs Forum 32(3):633-640, 2005.
6. Shafqat A, Einhorn LH, Hanna N, et al: Screening studies for fatigue and
laboratory correlates in cancer patients undergoing treatment. Ann Oncol in
press, 2005.
7. Liu L, Marler MR, Parker BA, et al: The relationship between fatigue and
light exposure during chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer in press, 2005.
8. Von Roenn JH, Paice JA: Control of common, non-pain cancer symptoms. Semin
Oncol 32(2):200-210, 2005.
9. Kroenke K, Wood DR, Mangelsdorff AD, et al: Chronic fatigue in primary care.
Prevalence, patient characteristics, and outcome. JAMA 260:929-934, 1988.
10. Morrison JD: Fatigue as a presenting complaint in family practice. J Family
Pract 10:795-801, 1980.
11. McDonald E, David AS, Pelosi AJ, Mann AH: Chronic fatigue in primary care
attendees. Psychol Med 23:987-998, 1993.
12. Piper BF, Linsey AM, Dodd MJ: Fatigue mechanism in cancer. Oncol Nursing
Forum 14:17-23, 1987.
13. Piper BF, Dribble SL, Dodd MJ, et al: The revised Piper Fatigue Scale:
psychometric evaluation in women with breast cancer. Oncol Nursing Forum
25:667-684, 1998.
14. Nicolson GL: Lipid replacement as an adjunct to therapy for chronic fatigue,
anti-aging and restoration of mitochondrial function. J Am Nutraceut Assoc
6(3):22-28, 2003.
15. Huang H, Manton KG: The role of oxidative damage in mitochondria during
aging: a review. Front Biosci 9:1100-1117, 2004.
16. Richter C, Par JW, Ames B: Normal oxidative damage to mitochondrial and
nuclear DNA is extensive. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 85:6465-6467, 1998.
17. Wei YH, Lee HC: Oxidative stress, mitochondrial DNA mutation and impairment
of antioxidant enzymes in aging. Exp Biol Med 227:671-682, 2002.
18. Harman D: Aging: A theory based on free radical and radiation chemistry. J
Gerontol 2:298-300, 1956.
19. Halliwell B: Role of free radicals in the neurodegenerative diseases:
therapeutic implications for antioxidant treatment. Drugs Aging 18:685-716,
2001.
20. Tan, NSS, Vinckenbosch NS, Liu N, et al: Selective cooperation between fatty
acid binding proteins and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in
regulating transcription. Mol Cell Biol 22:5114-51127, 2002.
21. Chen D, Cao G, Hastings T et al: Age-dependent decline of DNA repair
activity for oxidative lesions in rat brain mitochondria. J Neurochem
81:1273-1284, 2002.
22. Xu D, Finkel T: A role for mitochondria as potential regulators of cellular
life span. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 294:245-248, 2002.
23. Logan AC, Wong C: Chronic fatigue syndrome: oxidative stress and dietary
modifications. Altern Med Rev 6(5): 450-459, 2001.
24. Manuel y Keenoy B, Moorkens G, Vertommen J, et al: Antioxidant status and
lipoprotein peroxidation in chronic fatigue syndrome. Life Sci 68:2037-2049,
2001.
25. Richards RS, Roberts TK, McGregor NR, et al: Blood parameters indicative of
oxidative stress are associated with symptom expression in chronic fatigue
syndrome. Redox Rep 5:35-41, 2000.
26. Felle S, Mecocci P, Fano G, et al: Specific oxidative alterations in vastus
lateralis muscle of patients with the diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome.
Free Radical Biol Med 29:1252-1259, 2000.
27. Pall ML: Elevated, sustained peroxynitrite levels as the cause of chronic
fatigue syndrome. Med Hypotheses 54:115-125, 2000.
28. Castro L, Rodriguez M, Radi R: Aconitase is readily inactivated by
peroxynitrite, but not by its precursor,nitric oxide. J Biol Chem
269:29409-29415, 1994.
29. Radi R, Rodriguez M, Castro L, Telleri R: Inhibition of mitochondrial
electronic transport by peroxynitrite. Arch Biochem Biophys 308:89-95, 1994.
30. Manuel y Keenoy B, Moorkens G, Vertommen J, et al: Magnesium status and
parameters of the oxidant-antioxidant balance in patients with chronic fatigue:
effects of supplementation with magnesium. J Am Coll Nutr 19:374-382, 2000.
31. Kanno T, Sato EE, Muranaka S, Fujita H, Fujiwara T, Utsumi T, Inoue M,
Utsumi K: Oxidative stress underlies the mechanism for Ca(2+)-induced
permeability transition of mitochondria. Free Radical Res 38(1):27-35, 2004.
32. Nicolson GL, Poste G, Ji T: Dynamic aspects of cell membrane organization.
Cell Surface Rev 3:1-73, 1977.
33. Subczynski WK, Wisniewska A: Physical properties of lipid bilayer membranes:
relevance to membrane biological functions. Acta Biochim Pol 47:613-625, 2000.
34. Ellithorpe RR, Settineri R, Nicolson GL: Reduction of fatigue by use of a
dietary supplement containing glycophospholipids. J Am Nutraceut Assoc
6(1):23-28, 2003.
35. Agadjanyan M, Vasilevko V, Ghochikyan A, et al: Nutritional supplement (NTFactor)
restores mitochondrial function and reduces moderately severe fatigue in aged
subjects. J Chronic Fatigue Syndr 11(3):23-26, 2003.
36. Hajri T, Abumrad NA: Fatty acid transport across membranes: relevance to
nutrition and metabolic pathology. Annu Rev Nutr 22:383-415, 2002.
37. Hamilton JA: Fatty acid transport: difficult or easy? J Lipid Res
39(3):467-481, 1998.
38. Fellmann P, Herve P, Pomorski T, Muller P, et al: Transmembrane movement of
diether phospholipids in human erythrocytes and human fibroblasts. Biochem
39:4994-5003, 2000.
39. Conner SD, Schmid SL: Regulated portals of entry into the cell. Nature
422:37-44, 2003.
40. Mansbach CM, Dowell R: Effect of increasing lipid loads on the ability of
the endoplasmic reticulum to transport lipid to the Golgi. J Lipid Res
41:605-612, 2000.
41. De AK, Darad R: Age-associated changes in antioxidants and antioxidative
enzymes in rats. Mech Ageing Dev 59:123-128, 1991.
42. Ames BM: Micronutrients prevent cancer and delay aging. Toxicol Lett
102:1035-1038, 1998.
43. Sharman EH, Bondy SC: Effects of age and dietary antioxidants on cerebral
electron transport chain activity. Neurobiol Aging 22:629-634, 2001.
44. Sugiyama S, Yamada K, Ozawa T: Preservation of mitochondrial respiratory
function by coenzyme Q10 in aged rat skeletal muscle. Biochem Mol Biol Int
37:1111-1120, 1995.
45. Lin M, Simon D, Ahn C, et al: High aggregrate burden of somatic mtDNA point
mutations in aging and Alzheimer's disease brain. Human Mol Genet 11:133-145,
2002.
46. Seidman M, Khan MJ, Tang WX, Quirk WS: Influence of lecithin on
mitochondrial DNA and age-related hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
127:138-144, 2002.
47. Matthews RT, Yang L, Browne S, et al: Coenzyme Q10 administration increases
brain mitochondrial concentrations and exerts neuroprotective effects. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA 95:8892-8897, 1998.
48. Miquel J: Can antioxidant diet supplementation protect against age-related
mitochondrial damage? Ann NY Acad Sci 959:317-347, 2002.
49. De AK, Darad R: Age-associated changes in antioxidants and antioxidative
enzymes in rats. Mech Ageing Dev 59:123-128, 1991.
50. Nicolson GL, Ellithrope R: Lipid replacement and antioxidant nutritional
therapy for restoring mitochondrial function and reducing fatigue in chronic
fatigue syndrome and other fatiguing illnesses. J Chronic Fatigue Syndr 12(3):
in press, 2005.
51. Colodny L, Lynch K, Farber C, Papish S, et al: Results of a study to
evaluate the use of Propax to reduce adverse effects of chemotherapy. J Am
Nutraceut Assoc 2:17-25, 2000
View information about product support
Return to Library | Return to Article Top
(c) Copyright
1997-2007 Nutritional Therapeutics - Hauppauge, NY